general |
Aftersleep Books
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
National Geographic Photography Field Guide 2nd EdThe following report compares books using the SERCount Rating (base on the result count from the search engine). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Aftersleep Books - 2005-06-20 07:00:00 | © Copyright 2004 - www.aftersleep.com () | sitemap | top |
The chapters on the basics are both highly simplified and boringly detailed. At the same time they leave out critical information about the basics. For example, in the chapter on film, they spend a few pages discussing the difference between "pro" films and amateur films without saying very much except that there may be a difference. For the average photographer, who may be unable to find pro films in his local outlet, this certainly doesn't merit the lengthy discussion. However, the comparison of slide films and print films leaves out any mention of the wider exposure latitude of print films. The fact that print films can take in a greater range of light, so that bright tones are not burnt out, while shadows show detail, is an important consideration for many serious photographers.
I suppose the discussions of subject matters might prove helpful for an inexperienced photographer going out to shot a new kind of subject, but many of the specialty books dealing with subject matter will prove far more helpful.
This book advertises itself on the cover as "Revised & Updated with the latest in digital technology" but there is no mention of digital cameras until almost the last thirty pages of the book. Given that digital cameras now make up close to half of all camera sales, this is ludicrous. It feels like the chapter was added when someone suggested that something had to be said about digital photography. My litmus test for whether a book deals adequately with serious digital photography is the handling of white balance. This book makes no mention of it.
But my biggest complaint about this book is that after discussing the details and the subjects, the authors never really tell you how to make the transition from equipment and technique to taking pictures. Serious photography involves capturing a photographer's vision (which can be as simple as recording how cheery Aunt Tillie is or as weighty as considering the destruction of the environment). All the technique must be tied to this goal. The authors never get there.
As a general introduction to serious photography, this volume falls short in several areas. On the other hand, it might prove an occasional useful reference. I haven't read many comprehensive introductory photography guides lately. However, although it dealt primarily with nature photography, I think John Shaw's Nature Photography Field Guide would better serve someone just getting into serious photography than this book, and I'm sure there are many similar volumes available.