Is OJ simson guilty or innocent?

A place to argue, to talk. No violence is allowed. Any violator will be violently punished.

Moderator: Hatter Police

Is OJ simson guilty or innocent?

Postby matthewcrisp-bn on Thu Aug 04, 2005 6:12 am

I think he is innocent, there is too much of conspiracy to say otherwise,
his defense team had witnessess to say other people killed his ex wife and ronald goldman.
matthewcrisp-bn
 

Postby nowhere man on Thu Aug 04, 2005 6:51 am

If O.J is innocent....then who killed his wife?
nowhere man
Insane Hatter
Insane Hatter
 
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 2:03 am
Location: Where ever the wind blows me

Postby Math_nerd on Thu Aug 04, 2005 4:23 pm

They couldn't prove his guiltyness beond a shadow of a doubt, but they could prove that is was most likely that he did it ...... :shock:
Our heads are round - So that our thoughts may fly out in all directions.

Even the greatest of whales is helpless in the desert.
User avatar
Math_nerd
Slightly Inspired Hatter
Slightly Inspired Hatter
 
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 3:38 am
Location: Location is relative. To what? Dunno.

Postby Bomadeno on Thu Aug 04, 2005 5:01 pm

Who is OJ Simpson :oops:
User avatar
Bomadeno
Utterly Inspired Hatter
Utterly Inspired Hatter
 
Posts: 3123
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 9:53 pm
Location: Somewhere in England (not on, in)

who did it

Postby matthewcrisp-bn on Thu Aug 04, 2005 8:41 pm

Drug cartels nicoles friend was staying with nicole and she had a coke problem
matthewcrisp-bn
 

Postby nowhere man on Thu Aug 04, 2005 9:09 pm

OJ simpson was once a football player (not soccer, football) who was acused of the murdwer of his wife (back in the early 90's). He went on trail and was let off as innocent, but most people (including me) still think he was guilty
nowhere man
Insane Hatter
Insane Hatter
 
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 2:03 am
Location: Where ever the wind blows me

Postby Math_nerd on Thu Aug 04, 2005 9:52 pm

He was innocent of criminal charges, in which the defendant has to be proved gulty beond a shadow of a doubt. But in civil court, in which they award cash prizes for things like your dog dieing, they found him most likely guilty and he had to pay millions of dollers. So I'd say, he probably did it, but not likely enough to put him on death row.
Our heads are round - So that our thoughts may fly out in all directions.

Even the greatest of whales is helpless in the desert.
User avatar
Math_nerd
Slightly Inspired Hatter
Slightly Inspired Hatter
 
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 3:38 am
Location: Location is relative. To what? Dunno.

Postby Nobody on Fri Aug 05, 2005 9:23 pm

The man had Nicoles blood in his Bronco, on his shoes, on his socks, on his gloves.

The man was guilty, the prosection was just full of bumbling morons.

And Johnny Cochran played the prosecution and the jury brilliantly. He secured himself a place in history because of that one trial.
User avatar
Nobody
Great Hatter
Great Hatter
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:48 am
Location: Somewhere around Barstow on the edge of the USA

Postby Ssarl on Sun Aug 14, 2005 1:46 pm

Free OJ! Free Lemonade! [/list][/list]
(\ /)
(O.o)
(> <)COPY MR. BUNNY INTO YOUR SIG TO HELP HIM ACHIEVE WORLD DOMINATION.
Ssarl
Almost Hatter
Almost Hatter
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 12:10 am

Postby Pimienta on Mon Aug 15, 2005 1:51 pm

I've always thought he was guilty even though the only thing I know about the trial was that they found blood in his bronco, shoe and glove
User avatar
Pimienta
Pretty Inspired Hatter
Pretty Inspired Hatter
 
Posts: 2785
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 9:13 pm
Location: who's asking

Postby Loran Thompson on Mon Aug 15, 2005 8:47 pm

It's not even a debate, anyone who even questions his guilt is either ignoring the facts or is not an intelligent person. In the latter case I feel sorry for you.
User avatar
Loran Thompson
Almost Hatter
Almost Hatter
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 9:57 pm
Location: Mid-West United States

Postby hamster on Tue Aug 16, 2005 3:32 pm

It just shows how our trial by jury system is breaking down under the sheer weight of idiots caught in the spell of flashy lawyers.

Now some of the jury in the Michael Jackson case have come forward saying they regret their verdict -- too darn late.
User avatar
hamster
Insane Hatter
Insane Hatter
 
Posts: 867
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 7:24 pm
Location: Eastern US

Postby Nobody on Tue Aug 16, 2005 3:42 pm

hamster wrote:It just shows how our trial by jury system is breaking down under the sheer weight of idiots caught in the spell of flashy lawyers.

Now some of the jury in the Michael Jackson case have come forward saying they regret their verdict -- too darn late.


I would too if I could get a book deal out of it.
User avatar
Nobody
Great Hatter
Great Hatter
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:48 am
Location: Somewhere around Barstow on the edge of the USA

Postby punk04 on Tue Jan 03, 2006 6:42 am

hes guilty
User avatar
punk04
Mad Hatter
Mad Hatter
 
Posts: 369
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: im evrywhere


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests